Part of the remit of History Lab Plus is to help our members to overcome the sense of isolation that they sometimes feel as they finish their PhDs and contemplate their next steps. History Lab Plus is therefore happy to sponsor Lunchbox Tuesdays, a new weekly lunchtime group for late PhD and early career historians. This group is not intended as a seminar or forum for historical debate, but an informal way for individuals at similar academic levels to socialise over lunch.
Lunchbox Tuesdays will be held every Tuesday, 1-2pm in the common room of the Institute of Historical Research in the North Block of Senate House in London. The first meeting will be held on Tuesday, 4 November.
The idea is that people researching in London, rather than just those based there, will be able to drop in for cake and chat (did we mention cake?).
For more information about these meetings, please visit the Lunchbox Tuesdays Facebook page. Queries can also be directed at the organiser of Lunchbox Tuesdays, Kelly Spring, at email@example.com.
As History Lab Plus is a national organisation, we are actively looking to sponsor similar informal social groups all over the UK. If you are interested in starting up something in your region, please e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org
On 27th June we held the third ‘Ask the Experts’ event in London with the support of the Royal Historical Society. The event was intended to bring experts from the academy to comment on key issues relevant to early career researchers and those approaching the end of their PhD.
Our panel of experts: Professor Arthur Burns (King’s College London), Professor Margot Finn (UCL), Professor Peter Mandler (Cambridge & President, Royal Historical Society), Professor Nicola Miller (UCL) and Professor Mary Vincent (Sheffield).
The panel on … academic jobs
- The appointment committee will judge you on the day on how you’ll fit in the department. It is important that you have more than just the book and your research to make yourself a functioning colleague. Have a store of experiences and draw on them on your CV and in person. If you’ve organised events, won funding, handled administration then you’re bringing more to the table. There’s plenty of information out there on institutions, so do your research. A really good application letter will demonstrate a thoughtful consideration of how you would operate in that department.
- Think widely and think long term. How do you fit into the profession? What sort of historian are you and what do you want to become? Departments look for a sense of how people will develop. Look across the College and School. What interdisciplinary connections could you make? Do you have interests in other disciplines and departments?
- Presentations are a test for your teaching skills. Can you engage the audience? You must convey what type of historian you are. Those outside your subject will wonder what you’re going to bring. Demonstrate a sense of self that goes beyond the dissertation.
- It is rare that appointment committees are homogenous so you must consider how to speak to potentially different audiences in the interview. A panel member from outside the discipline will take a different approach.
- References are still an integral part of the appointment. If you don’t have a reference from your supervisor this can appear odd, and the same goes for your current institution. Consider asking your external examiner to be a reference.
- Age is not a factor. You are dated from the award of your PhD. Academics might come from different career backgrounds and can bring with them much experience as a result.
Peter Mandler strongly recommended an academic career. He acknowledged that because it was still desirable, it was therefore grossly overstocked. Despite early setbacks, he never thought it wasn’t worth persisting. While acknowledging the increase in pressure and fewer resources, ultimately the academic profession is more vibrant and outward looking than ever before. You need to be a good teacher, a good communicator, be able to engage wider audiences, and be interdisciplinary. The job specification is tougher than it used to be but far more inspiring.
The panel on … public engagement
- If public engagement is done well it can change the way you think about doing history. It forces you to ask ‘so what?’ You can’t assume your audience have read any literature. What is the big question you’re trying to ask and answer? Your audience can spark new thoughts.
- Public engagement can be regarded as a diversion, but not if you do it well and thoughtfully. Most job descriptions will mention it. Seek out opportunities and look beyond just museums and archives to smaller organisations.
- As an early career researcher you can do quite a lot on a fairly small scale: organising a small exhibition or workshop can be achievable and generate feedback. There are sources of money around for this type of work.
- Some departments may have a greater tradition of public engagement than others. It is up to you to look at local activities and consider how the wider themes and projects of the department can fit in. There are passionate local historians, heritage workers, and genealogists working outside the university. Even if you don’t work on British local history, there are still opportunities.
- Margot Finn’s project on The East India Company at Home, 1757-1857 is a good example of research that involved many people and organisations beyond academia, and produced output suitable for both academic and non-academic audiences.
The panel on … Open Access and REF2020
- The Open Access policy doesn’t apply until 2016 but it is worth getting used to. As a matter of academic practice we should get used to submitting the accepted manuscript in an institutional repository. If you don’t have an institution or your institution doesn’t have a repository, try your PhD-granting institution. But don’t worry unduly- you are exempt until your first academic role.
- You should be working on your best work and publishing in the forms you feel are best. Don’t be put off publishing in refereed journals. It is harder to be visible in edited collections and the process can be haphazard with editing and scrutiny. The peer review process for an article in a quality journal will make your article better.
- Open access only applies to articles in journals. You have to publish in compliant journals and there are a limited number, but you can ask advice from your University. Peter Mandler advised submitting to compliant journal if you can but it may not be possible. You may publish anywhere if that journal is the most appropriate for you.US journals especially from learned societies may not be compliant.
- Fewer and better publications are better in the medium to long term. Publish really good things. The maximum number you can submit to the REF is four items.
- Beware of pirates. Don’t use journals you’ve never heard of, or even not used their content. Never pay for open access. Any reputable journal should have a gold and green option. Green helps for those without institutional support.
- If you are RCUK funded then your dissertation should be made open access. Check what embargo periods are available and check the mandate of your own institution. There is huge variation so you need to be informed. If you’re not funded, you’re not required to do anything but if you want to be employable in the UK you need to be compliant and keep an eye on the rules.The Royal Historical Society provides accurate advice aimed at historians funded by RCUK.
At the end of the afternoon we heard about plans for the Royal Historical Society website which will feature specific resources for early career researchers on topics such as: presenting your work, grant applications, and publishing. The new website will launch in October and will be a valuable resource for ECRs.
We are grateful to the panel of experts for giving up their time as well as Dr Adam Smith for his assistance and the Royal Historical Society for generously supporting the event.
Helen Steele, History Lab Plus Representative to the Royal Historical Society.